Sunday, April 6, 2014

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Poised to Clamp Down on High Frequency Trading

I don't know if this is the right approach. Speed per se isn't the concern so much as quote stuffing and spoofing.
From the Australian Financial Review:
ASIC poised to clamp down on HFT
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has threatened to introduce clamps on super-fast computer trades to reduce their speed if the controversial practice continues unchecked.

The proposal to slow down trades is inspired by United States exchange IEX, which United States author Michael Lewis holds up in his new book as the country’s only “fair exchange”.

The clamps pause trades for half a second before being executed in an effort to take away the speed advantage for HFT traders.

The ASIC has told David Murray’s financial services inquiry that investors are concerned the markets are rigged and will “walk away” if high-frequency traders continue to skim their profits.

“If people can’t have trust and confidence in the market, then you don’t have a market,” ASIC chairman Greg Medcraft told The Australian Financial Review. “The strength of the market is reflected in how many retail investors you have. If you discourage real buyers, then markets become trading for trading’s sake, rather than serving the real economy.”....MORE
The AFR was kind in not pointing up ETF's and money management as reasons for the departure of individual investors from individual securities and from the exchanges.

 RE quote stuffing I keep coming back to the Exchange Act:
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 9 -- Manipulation of Security Prices

a. Transactions relating to purchase or sale of security

It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, or for any member of a national securities exchange--
  1. For the purpose of creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading in any security registered on a national securities exchange, or a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for any such security, (A) to effect any transaction in such security which involves no change in the beneficial ownership thereof, or (B) to enter an order or orders for the purchase of such security with the knowledge that an order or orders of substantially the same size, at substantially the same time, and at substantially the same price, for the sale of any such security, has been or will be entered by or for the same or different parties, or (C) to enter any order or orders for the sale of any such security with the knowledge that an order or orders of substantially the same size, at substantially the same time, and at substantially the same price, for the purchase of such security, has been or will be entered by or for the same or different parties.

  2. To effect, alone or with one or more other persons, a series of transactions in any security registered on a national securities exchange or in connection with any security-based swap agreement (as defined in section 206B of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) with respect to such security creating actual or apparent active trading in such security, or raising or depressing the price of such security, for the purpose of inducing the purchase or sale of such security by others.
If someone has deliberately and repeatedly violated the act, imprison them, fine them, bar them for life and clawback any ill-gotten gains. If the behavior isn't a violation move on.