Sunday, September 7, 2014

The Economist: "What if the Scots say Yes?"

From Buttonwood's Notebook:
COUNTRIES don't break up every day, particularly those as large and prosperous as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (to give the country its full title). But it is possible that, two weeks from now, the headline writers will be calling it the "Disunited Kingdom" if the Scots vote for independence in a referendum on September 18th.

For much of the year, markets have been ignoring the vote, largely because the No side has been consistently ahead. But the latest polls have been narrowing, putting the No vote just six points in front - within a plausible margin for error (remember all those 2012 polls showing Romney heading for the White House). Even a narrow No victory might be unsettling, implying the likelihood of a further vote in a few years' time. So the markets are having to contemplate what the financial consequences might be; sterling recently reached a five month low against the dollar.

The issues, for those non-Britons who have not been following the debate, are fourfold. What currency will the Scots adopt? The Yes campaign says they will keep the pound, the Westminster parties say this is out of the question (essentially this would recreate the euro problem, in which monetary union would exist without political union). The EU could insist, as it does with other new nations, that the Scots agree eventually to join the euro. The pro-independence group says EU spokesmen are wrong (Scots are already in the EU so would not be be new members) and that the English parties are bluffing. An independent Scotland can call the bluff of the rest of the UK by taking a hard line on the second big issue - the allocation of national debt. How should this debt be apportioned among the rump UK countries? By population? By GDP? If Westminster plays hard ball, the Scots could walk away altogether (although this sounds a bit like a bluff as well; the consequences for the new state would be stark, in the short term)....
...So how would the markets react to independence? The immediate reaction would probably be to sell sterling, especially as many traders are quite long sterling (the pound had been moving up earlier in 2014 on the expectation of a rate rise). David Owen of Jefferies thinks a Yes vote will influence monetary policy
we can expect the market to quickly price out a rate rise for a long time to come and for the BoE to make clear it will provide lender of last resort in the protracted and perhaps heated negotiation phase before Scotland actually became independent (2016 at the earliest).
UK government bonds (gilts) would probably weaken as well. For a start, it is not clear how the debt split would be practically acheived. Rating agencies have indicated that Scotland would have a lower credit rating than the UK, requiring a higher yield....MORE
The Economist's confreres at FT Alphaville also seem to have an interest in the topic.